I should make a qualification here. In linguistics circles it’s risky to call one language ‘easier’ than another one, for there is no single metric by which we can determine objective rankings. But even if there is no bright line between day and night, we’d never pretend there’s no difference between life at 10am and life at 10pm. Likewise, some languages plainly jangle with more bells and whistles than others. If someone were told he had a year to get as good at either Russian or Hebrew as possible, and would lose a fingernail for every mistake he made during a three-minute test of his competence, only the masochist would choose Russian – unless he already happened to speak a language related to it. In that sense, English is ‘easier’ than other Germanic languages, and it’s because of those Vikings.
Old English had the crazy genders we would expect of a good European language – but the Scandies didn’t bother with those, and so now we have none. Chalk up one of English’s weirdnesses. What’s more, the Vikings mastered only that one shred of a once-lovely conjugation system: hence the lonely third‑person singular -‹s›, hanging on like a dead bug on a windshield. Here and in other ways, they smoothed out the hard stuff.
_____________◊ authp_J_o_h_n_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
K E Y W O R D S
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
◊ authp_J_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
◊ authp_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
◊ web_art, webhdr_a_e_o_n
◊ yauth_2_0_1_5, yedit_2_0_1_5
◊ lantxt_en, hdr_v3
• keywords_da_inserire
_____
¯¯¯¯¯
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento