aeon.co (13/11/2015) • Why is English so weird… (d6)

▤  •  M c W h o r t e r  (2 0 1 5)  •  W h y  i s  E n g l i s h  s o  w e i r d l y  d i f f e r e n t …  •

---

‹Caveat lector›, though: traditional accounts of English tend to oversell what these imported levels of formality in our vocabulary really mean. It is sometimes said that they alone make the vocabulary of English uniquely rich, which is what Robert McCrum, William Cran and Robert MacNeil claim in the classic ‹The Story of English› (1986): that the first load of Latin words actually lent Old English speakers the ability to express abstract thought. But no one has ever quantified richness or abstractness in that sense (who are the people of any level of development who evidence no abstract thought, or even no ability to express it?), and there is no documented language that has only one word for each concept. Languages, like human cognition, are too nuanced, even messy, to be so elementary. Even unwritten languages have formal registers. What’s more, one way to connote formality is with substitute expressions: English has ‹life› as an ordinary word and ‹existence› as the fancy one, but in the Native American language Zuni, the fancy way to say ‹life› is ‘a breathing into’.

_____________
K E Y W O R D S
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

◊ authp_J_o_h_n_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
◊ authp_J_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
◊ authp_M_c_W_h_o_r_t_e_r
◊ web_art, webhdr_a_e_o_n
◊ yauth_2_0_1_5, yedit_2_0_1_5
◊ lantxt_en, hdr_v3

• keywords_da_inserire

_____
¯¯¯¯¯