Origin of Species… • 15. Recapitulation and conclusion (10…)

≣  •  D a r w i n  (1 8 5 9,  1 8 7 2⁶)  •  15.  R e c a p i t u l a t i o n  a n d  c o n c l u s i o n  •  √it

---

I can answer these questions and objections only on the supposition that the geological record is far more imperfect than most geologists believe. The number of specimens in all our museums is absolutely as nothing compared with the countless generations of countless species which have certainly existed. The parent-form of any two or more species would not be in all its characters directly intermediate between its modified offspring, any more than the rock pigeon is directly intermediate in crop and tail between its descendants, the pouter and fantail pigeons. We should not be able to recognise a species as the parent of another and modified species, if we were to examine the two ever so closely, unless we possessed most of the intermediate links; and owing to the imperfection of the geological record, we have no just right to expect to find so many links. If two or three, or even more linking forms were discovered, they would simply be ranked by many naturalists as so many new species, more especially if found in different geological sub-stages, let their differences be ever so slight. Numerous existing doubtful forms could be named which are probably varieties; but who will pretend that in future ages so many fossil links will be discovered, that naturalists will be able to decide whether or not these doubtful forms ought to be called varieties? Only a small portion of the world has been geologically explored. Only organic beings of certain classes can be preserved in a fossil condition, at least in any great number.  [⇒]

___________
KEY_WORDS
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

◊ authp_C_h_a_r_l_e_s_D_a_r_w_i_n
◊ authp_C_h_D_a_r_w_i_n
◊ authp_D_a_r_w_i_n
◊ cover_O_r_i_g_i_n_o_f_S_p_e_c_i_e_s
◊ edit_J_o_h_n_M_u_r_r_a_y
◊ edit_J_M_u_r_r_a_y
◊ edit_M_u_r_r_a_y
◊ yauth_1_8_5_9, yauth_1_8_7_2, yedit_1_8_7_2
◊ book_quote, lantxt_en, hdr_v2

• keywords_da_inserire

_____
[]  C h.  D a r w i n,  ‹T h e  O r i g i n  o f  S p e c i e s›,  J o h n  M u r r a y,  1 8 7 2⁶.
¯¯¯¯¯